| Secret codes Evolveo FX520 |
| Root Evolveo FX520 |
| Unlock Evolveo FX520 |
| Firmware Evolveo FX520 |
| Developer Mode Evolveo FX520 |
| Bypass Lock Screen Evolveo FX520 |
| Remove a Google account Evolveo FX520 |
| Evolveo FX520 Factory Reset |
| Screenshot Evolveo FX520 |
|
OS: Android 4.1 Jelly Bean CPU: ARM Cortex A9, Processor clock: 1.00 GHz, RAM: 512 MB Display: Color / TFT, 480 x 800 px (5.00") 187 ppi, ~63.3% screen-to-body ratio Camera: 5 Mpx Battery: Li-Ion 1500 mAh |
| Hardware and OS Evolveo FX520 | |
| Operating system: | Android 4.1 Jelly Bean |
| Processor: | ARM Cortex A9 Processor clock: 1.00 GHz |
| RAM memory: | 512 MB |
| Internal memory: | 4 GB |
| Memory cards: | yes microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) |
| Display Evolveo FX520 | |
| Display: | Color / TFT 480 x 800 px (5.00") 187 ppi ~63.3% screen-to-body ratio |
| Display protection: | yes |
| Touchscreen: | yes |
| Connectivity Evolveo FX520 | |
| NFC: | yes |
| Bluetooth: | yes v2.1 |
| GPS: | yes |
| GPRS: | yes |
| EDGE: | yes |
| WiFi: | yes |
| Hotspot WiFi: | yes |
| DLNA: | yes |
| IrDA: | yes |
| USB: | yes v2.0 |
| WAP: | yes v2.0 |
| Camera Evolveo FX520 | |
| Main camera: | 5 Mpx |
| Image Resolution: | 2592x1944 px |
| Flash: | yes LED |
| Digital zoom: | yes |
| Video formats: | H.263, H.264, MPEG4 |
| Selfie camera: | 0.3 Mpx |
| Image Resolution: | 640x480 px |
| Flash: | yes |
| Digital zoom: | yes |
| Multimedia Evolveo FX520 | |
| Radio: | yes with RDS |
| Design Evolveo FX520 | |
| Dimensions: | 146.00 x 77.00 x 11.00 mm |
| Weight: | 199.00 g |
| Battery Evolveo FX520 | |
| Capacity: | Li-Ion 1500 mAh |
| Quick battery charging: | yes |
| Wireless battery charging: | yes |
| Other Evolveo FX520 | |
| Accelerometer: | yes |
| Altimeter: | yes |
| Barometer: | yes |
| Fingerprint scanner: | yes |
| Gravity: | yes |
| Gyroscope: | yes |
| Hall-effect: | yes |
| Hygrometer: | yes |
| Iris scanner: | yes |
| Magnetometer: | yes |
| Proximity: | yes |
| Thermometer: | yes |
 | HewKyly | April 11, 2024 |
| Feature phones are simpler, cheaper, and have longer battery life. They have physical buttons and are more durable. | ||
| Reply | ||
| Dizjhc | May 09, 2024 |
| Limited functionality, outdated specs, bulky design, short battery life. | ||
| Reply | ||
| Malimu | May 01, 2024 |
| Decent phone, good features, average performance. | ||
| Reply | ||
